A Reuters exclusive has revealed the true scale of US casualties in Operation Epic Fury. The Pentagon had publicly disclosed only 8 seriously injured. The real figure is nearly 20 times higher. Seven service members have been killed. Iran says it is winning.
For ten days, the Pentagon's public account of American casualties in Operation Epic Fury had been strikingly narrow: eight US personnel seriously injured. On 10 March 2026, Reuters reported a figure nearly twenty times higher. Two people familiar with the matter told the news agency that as many as 150 US troops had been wounded in the war with Iran, a statistic that had not been previously reported and that the Pentagon had not disclosed. The White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, when asked directly, confirmed the figure was in the ballpark.
Within hours of the Reuters report, the Pentagon issued a statement through chief spokesperson Sean Parnell acknowledging approximately 140 wounded service members. Parnell stated that 108 of those had already returned to duty and that the vast majority of injuries were minor. He confirmed the eight seriously wounded personnel were receiving the highest level of medical care. Fox News reporter Jennifer Griffin, citing sources, said those eight face life-threatening injuries. The Pentagon has separately warned that additional casualties are likely as Iranian attacks continue across the region.
Iran Names New Supreme Leader After Khamenei Killed in US-Israel StrikeThe conflict has claimed seven American lives as of 10 March 2026. The deadliest single incident came in the opening days of the operation when an Iranian drone struck a US military facility in Kuwait, killing most of the dead in a single attack. The majority of the killed were Army Reserve troops. A seventh service member died later from wounds sustained in a separate Iranian retaliatory strike on a US base in Saudi Arabia. Trump had held a ceremony honouring the fallen service members before the death toll reached seven, underlining how rapidly the conflict's human cost has mounted.
The Pentagon has consistently stated throughout the campaign that US commanders and Trump himself had told Americans to expect more casualties. Joint Chiefs chairman General Dan Caine, speaking at the Pentagon on 10 March, framed the casualty count in the context of a sustained offensive against a capable adversary. The broader context of those deaths matters: US forces are operating from at least eight permanent military bases across the Middle East in Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, all of which have been subjected to Iranian missile and drone strikes since 28 February.
Tehran's account of the conflict's progress stands in direct opposition to Washington's. Ebrahim Rezaei, spokesperson for the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Iranian Parliament, stated on 10 March that the balance of the war had shifted in favour of Iran and that the initiative was now in the hands of Iran's military forces. He claimed the success rate of Iranian missile and drone strikes was over 90%, though he provided no independent evidence for either assertion. Iran has also ruled out any immediate ceasefire as long as attacks continue.
US Joint Chiefs chairman General Caine offered the American counter-assessment: that US and Israeli operations had degraded Iran's military capabilities significantly and that the campaign was proceeding to plan. Trump has described the operation as ahead of schedule. The gap between the two sets of claims is almost impossible to verify independently from outside the region, but the confirmed casualty count of 150 US troops wounded and 7 killed, alongside US intelligence warnings about Iranian mine preparations, suggests Iran retains a meaningful capacity to impose costs on US forces despite the scale of the offensive.
| Party / Location | Killed | Wounded | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Forces | 7 | ~140-150 | 108 returned to duty |
| Iran (civilian & military) | 1,255+ | Hundreds | 3,000+ US targets struck |
| Israel | 13 | 1,929 | 157 injured in last 24 hrs |
| Gulf States (UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain) | 14 | 112+ | UAE nationals from Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh |
| Jordan | 0 | 14 | 119 Iranian missiles and drones intercepted |
| Iraq | 2+ | 5+ | US-Israel strike on Jurf al-Sakher PMF base |
The scale of Iranian retaliation has been broader geographically than many analysts anticipated. The US operates permanent military bases in Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and all have been subjected to Iranian strikes or credible threats since the conflict began. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, the US has between 40,000 and 50,000 service members stationed across the Middle East in those eight permanent bases and a network of smaller forward sites. The countries with the highest concentrations of US forces are Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE and Saudi Arabia.
The distribution of those forces across multiple countries means Iran has a wide target set from which to draw. Each retaliatory strike, even if only causing minor injuries, accumulates into the casualty figure that Reuters exposed: 150 wounded across 10 days of what the Pentagon calls sustained attacks. The strategic implication is that the geography of US basing in the Gulf, an enormous logistical and strategic asset in peacetime, becomes a vulnerability when the primary adversary is Iran, which has spent decades planning and rehearsing exactly this kind of dispersed, attritional campaign against US regional forces.
The revelation that 150 US troops have been wounded, nearly twenty times the figure the Pentagon had previously made public, will intensify domestic scrutiny of the conflict's human cost. Trump and senior officials have consistently pre-empted public concern by warning that casualties are to be expected, framing them as the price of eliminating Iran's nuclear and military threat. But the gap between the Pentagon's disclosed figures and the actual casualty count will invite harder questions from Congress, particularly from legislators in states where the killed and seriously wounded service members were based.
The mine threat represents the most alarming near-term escalation risk. If Iran deploys mines in the Strait of Hormuz at any meaningful scale, the waterway becomes not merely politically closed, as it is now, but physically hazardous in a way that would require a sustained US Navy mine-clearing operation before commercial tanker traffic could safely resume. That scenario, already being assessed by US intelligence, would extend the energy supply disruption by weeks or months and erase whatever market optimism Trump's comments about an imminent end to the war had generated.
For now, the war is entering its second week with no ceasefire, no formal diplomatic channel, and a casualty toll on the US side that is higher than the public had been told. Defence Secretary Hegseth's insistence that the enemy must be totally and decisively defeated, against Trump's signals that the conflict is nearly over, leaves the timeline deeply uncertain. The one thing both sides agree on is that this is not finished.
